Andrew
Key
strength of the scheme: Your experimentation and rigour had been
outstanding also well done on another interesting project. You have
continually explored your ideas with great end results.
Most
significant weakness of the scheme: Drawing quality
Danny
Key
strength of the scheme: Very interesting spatial forms – and fit to
the environment I would have liked to see more detail however. Also
there was no continuity between your final work and your weekly
progress.
Most
significant weakness of the scheme: More refined drawings would have
helped your presentation.
Dian
Key
strength of the scheme: Some interesting bold forms and connection
with the water is well done.
Most
significant weakness of the scheme: Too simplistic – elements
remain shapes/forms and don't translate well into architecture. Also
many of your drawings are incorrect (I.e. not true one point
perspectives or para line drawings).
Ibrahim
Key
strength of the scheme: Good improvement. Your 2 forms and their
scale work well in the environment.
Most
significant weakness of the scheme: Scheme could have benefited from
further refinement. 2 monuments very basic in their relationship to
each other and the environment. This could have been further
developed.
Judy
Key
strength of the scheme: Beautiful drawings and great overall
presentation skills. Well done on another great submission.
Most
significant weakness of the scheme: More sophisticated link to your
land form and surrounding would have benefited your overall
monument. You could have demonstrated more of a relationship to the
surrounds and in turn let this impact upon your design (not design in
a vacuum).
Martha
Key
strength of the scheme: Well done on another great submission.
Sophisticated spaces with innate good proportion and scale. Movement
within space also good.
Most
significant weakness of the scheme: Scheme lacks relationship between
environment. It works as an object but not so well with its
surrounds. More investigation needed here to develop your overall
scheme.
Matthew
Key
strength of the scheme: Monuments scale and its position/location
within the environment.
Most
significant weakness of the scheme: Your scheme needs much more
spatial development. The monument still reads as a 2D object and
needs more 3D realisation.
Maxim
Key
strength of the scheme: Good development. Very interesting overall
forms and relationship with the edge of the land form.
Most
significant weakness of the scheme: Your monument reads well as a 2D
element but needs more 3D resolution. More detail would have helped
your refine the spatial quality of the scheme.
Nicholas
Key
strength of the scheme: Good work and well done on producing a
striking monument. Not only is the monument a striking object but so
too is the relationship to the land form.
Most
significant weakness of the scheme: Your scheme could be more
cohesive. Some of its parts do not seem to fit together well.
Olivia
Key
strength of the scheme: Monumentality and scale fit well into the
environment.
Most
significant weakness of the scheme: Block forms are too simplistic
and real lack spatial quality. Also lack of materiality and texture
do not aid your scheme.
Pearl
Key
strength of the scheme: Scale and its fit to the environment.
Most
significant weakness of the scheme: Lack of cohesion across your
scheme some parts don't fit or work so well together. Also lack of
textures and materiality detract from your submission too.
Rena
Key
strength of the scheme: Beautiful textures and good design work.
Most
significant weakness of the scheme: More development and process work
(each week) could have assisted and benefited your overall
submission.
Toby
Key
strength of the scheme: Interesting spatial form and interconnection
between the 2 monuments.
Most
significant weakness of the scheme: More development and process work
(each week) needed for your drawings. More refinement needed.
Vera
Key
strength of the scheme: Great form and interplay between monuments
and environment. Nice textures and materials also.
Most
significant weakness of the scheme: Some of the elements could have
been further refined. They still read as 2D objects not 3D spaces.
Yuki
Key
strength of the scheme: Some nice images and use of textures to
delineate different form. Nice use of lighting too.
Most
significant weakness of the scheme: Too basic a form and it needed
more spatial development. Scheme remained as a 2D needed more 3D
resolution.
